Chronology

If you could look back from where you've arrived, Sometimes you might see your former self with dread, You'll never take an active part in your life again, You won't understand what drove you, what made your blood boil.

Your mother's face flashes before you, her painful smile, She suffered the world into existence, smeared with amniotic fluid, You were born fighting, coming into the light screaming, Then the pain faded away into the distance, lost in the darkness.

Years passed, you started to learn, some things stuck with you, You turned your small steps into milestones, You never imagined you would be nothing more than a number, You would sometimes cry your sorrows into your song, drown them in wine.

Now you would look back, you might laugh or maybe cry, You would do everything differently now, you would do it all differently, You can almost see how many people are there, no one is standing by the grave, You could decide now, whether you want to live or die.

Over there, everything is real, the images are sharp, Many years, friendships, loves, joys, are gone, Buried with you are grudges, harms, sins, They no longer cause wounds, they no longer cause alarm.

You lived, don't search for its meaning in vain, it's pointless, You were late, you hurried, you rushed, you wanted to get it over with, You grew up, your existence went by, passed, then slumped into this age, Yet they told you - you don't always have to run so hard.

Now you can rest, you chased, you drove your twenty-one grams, You let yourself be hurt or maybe you even struck back sometimes, You believed that your existence was still good, that it held many surprises, You fought for it, you struggled, you bravely stood up for it.

If you could, you would sob, reaching out, longing to be alive, But above you is earth, under you is earth, the sky is so far away, Buried is the naive dream of the former little child, It was a moment that you thought would be yours forever.

Lukács Judit***2024.05.18. Hungary. Vác. ,,Edibor,,

Becoming Whole malcolm j hines

Writing poems is more than a pastime

It's a way of clearing my head

Sometimes for extinguishing angst

Sometimes killing boredom dead

Sometimes I get taken up by artistry

There's a lot of wonder in there

Sometimes I write to my Creator

There's a calmness I can't explain

Lately poems are slowing down

I'm writing little stories

about moments in my life

that I could never shake off me

You might know the kind I mean

When you were put on the spot

Maybe humiliated by an employer

Maybe betrayed by a wife

Maybe a group acted against you

Maybe a cop treated you mean

Maybe your parents never said they loved you

Maybe your brother knocked you out

Maybe you spent your young years 

not giving 100%

because you were afraid you knew you were brilliant

and you didn't want to stick out

That's a kind of depression, I think

Keeping your head down to contain your anger

Well, these days I'm removing that

one story at a time!  I will examine...

Then I'll put them all together

under the subject of "mindful Living"

If i write a book, I'll have a pseudonym 

The only way to truth, my man

Rising to objective thinking yields

a freedom from chains of pain

The type you create yourself

from dwelling on unresolved strains

I sense after the understanding comes

compassion will follow

but there must be ongoing work afterwards

so that there's no regressing

It's a nasty journey

Old memories are crushing disasters

But I experience momentary releases in between

that are quite joyful

Eventually I do expect

my life with have more meaning

I'll likely accept myself more

Consciousness will be more inviting

This was a good poem for me

The ending is more clear

The journey is not an insurmountable mountain

I'm nearer that I think

Celebrating the Life and Literary Legacy of Sumitranandan Pant: A Pillar of Chhayavaad A Luminary of Hindi Literature

Celebrating the Life and Literary Legacy of Sumitranandan Pant: A Pillar of Chhayavaad

A Luminary of Hindi Literature

Sumitranandan Pant, born on May 20, 1900, was an eminent Indian poet, widely regarded as a pillar of the Chhayavadi movement in Hindi literature. His profound and evocative poetry, characterized by its rich imagery, musicality, and exploration of nature, love, and the human spirit, earned him a place among the most celebrated poets of the 20th century.  His poetry, marked by lyrical beauty and profound emotion, earned him the title of "Kavi-Chakravarti" (Emperor of Poets). Yet, Pant's life was a tapestry of contradictions, shaped by the socio-political landscape of his time.

Early Life and Literary Influences

Born into a Brahmin family in Garhwal, Uttarakhand, Pant's early life was steeped in tradition and spirituality. However, he was also exposed to the rising tide of nationalism that swept across India in the wake of British colonial rule. This exposure instilled in him a deep love for his country and a yearning for its liberation.

Born in Kausani, Uttarakhand, amidst the picturesque Kumaon hills, Pant's childhood was deeply influenced by the natural beauty that surrounded him. This connection to nature would later become a recurring theme in his poetry. His early exposure to Sanskrit literature and the works of Rabindranath Tagore also shaped his literary sensibilities.

The Chhayavadi Movement

Pant emerged as a prominent figure in the Chhayavadi movement, a literary renaissance in Hindi poetry that flourished in the early 20th century. Chhayavadi poets, inspired by Romanticism and Symbolism, sought to express the inner world of emotions, imagination, and spirituality. Pant's poetry epitomized these ideals, infused with a sense of mysticism and a deep appreciation for the beauty of the natural world.

As Pant matured, his poetry began to reflect a growing awareness of the social and political realities of his time. He witnessed the struggles of the marginalized and the injustices of the colonial system. This awareness led him to incorporate themes of social consciousness and protest into his works.  Pant's poetry is not without its contradictions. While he expressed sympathy for the marginalized, he also held a deep reverence for traditional values and spirituality. This internal conflict is evident in his works, reflecting the broader contradictions of Indian society during that era.

Despite these contradictions, Pant's legacy remains significant. His poetry, infused with emotion, social consciousness, and a search for meaning, continues to resonate with readers today.  Pant's works offer valuable insights into the social and political struggles of early 20th-century India, providing a powerful voice for the voiceless.

Major Works and Literary Style

Pant's literary career spanned over five decades, producing a rich and diverse body of work. His notable works include:

• Veena (1918): A collection of early poems marked by simplicity and a celebration of nature

• Pallav (1925): A compilation of mature poems showcasing Pant's mastery of language and imagery

• Iduna (1936): A collection of poems reflecting Pant's philosophical musings and spiritual quest

• Gramya (1946): A collection of poems inspired by rural life and its simple joys

• Sikta ki Mala (1956): A collection of poems marked by a deeper introspection and exploration of the human condition

Pant's poetry is characterized by its lyrical beauty, rich imagery, and exploration of universal themes. He was a master of wordplay, employing metaphors, similes, and personification to create vivid and evocative imagery. His poems often delve into the depths of human emotions, exploring love, loss, joy, sorrow, and the search for meaning in life.

Literary Legacy and Impact

Sumitranandan Pant's contributions to Hindi literature are immense and enduring. He is considered one of the pioneers of modern Hindi poetry, his works leaving an indelible mark on the literary landscape. His poetry continues to inspire and captivate readers, its timeless themes resonating across generations.

Remembering a Literary Legend

As we commemorate the birth anniversary of Sumitranandan Pant, we honor his legacy as a visionary poet who enriched Hindi literature with his profound and evocative verses. His works continue to inspire and enlighten readers, reminding us of the beauty of language, the power of imagination, and the enduring human spirit.

Sumitra Nandan Pant's life and literature reveal a complex and multifaceted figure. His poetry, while rooted in Romanticism, evolved to encompass themes of social consciousness and protest, reflecting the changing socio-political landscape of his time. Pant's works continue to hold relevance, offering a glimpse into the contradictions and aspirations of a society in transition.

पन्त की कविताएं हिंदी में: https://hindi-kavita.com/HindiGramyaPant.php

मोदी समेत 28 पर केस

1. कोविशील्ड बनाने वाली कंपनी ने भाजपा को 52 करोड़ की डोनेशन दी, भाजपा ने मुहमांगे दामों पर वैक्सीन खरीदी और बदले में पूनावाला से सीधे कमीशन ले लिया और ये वो रकम है जो बुक्स में दर्ज है जो प्रूडेंट के रास्ते गयी है जो सीधे या कैश गयी होगी उसका हिसाब खुलना बाकी है।

2. रुइया बंधुओं पर ईडी कारवाई करती है बदले में एस्सार ग्रूप 50 करोड़ देता है।

3. आर्सेलर मित्तल के मालिक सरकार से निवेदन करते हैं कि एस्सार मामले में जो जांच चल रही है उसमें उन्हें छूट दी जाये बाद में मित्तल ग्रूप अलग-अलग तारीखों में 120 करोड़ चंदा देता है।

4. भारती एयरटेल पर 700 करोड़ के कस्टम ड्यूटी और टैक्स इवेशन का केस होता है, भारती एयरटेल 40 करोड़ चंदा देती है आज वो केस कहां है किसी को नहीं पता है।

5. जीएमआर पर ईडी रेड होती है थोड़ा चंदा देना पड़ता है थोड़ा कंपनी अदानी को बेचनी पड़ती है।

6. फ्यूचर गेमिंग पर ईडी की रेड होती है, कंपनी 100 करोड़ चंदा देती है।

7. आरपीएसजी ग्रूप पर ईडी की रेड होती है वो 45 करोड़ चंदा भी देते हैं और सोनिया राहुल के नेशनल हेराल्ड में सरकार के मनमुताबिक गवाही भी

8. मनी लांड्रिंग के मामले में डीएलएफ ग्रूप पर देश भर में छापे पडे़ और कंपनी ने 25 करोड़ चंदा दे दिया।

ये पूरी तरह से लीगल घूसखोरी है विपक्ष को इस मामले को जनता के बीच ले जाना चाहिए कि कैसे एक तडीपार सरकार चला रहा है। सरकार वसूली भाई के रोल में आ चुकी है पहले रेड मारेगी फिर पैसे लेकर मामला दबा देगी।

( abhishekh singh )

#ExtortionistGovt

#वसूली_सरकार

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/yX5of55dtX8JnaFj/?mibextid=oFDknk 

Misuse of State Machinery and Electoral bond Scams

In recent years, the Indian political landscape has been rife with allegations from the Congress and other opposition parties against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), particularly under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. These accusations center on the claim that the BJP operates as a "washing machine" for corrupt politicians, and that it misuses state machinery like the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for political gain. Furthermore, the controversy surrounding electoral bonds has intensified these criticisms. 

 These issues can be analyzed through the lens of class struggle, state power, and the dynamics of capitalist democracy.

### The "Washing Machine" Allegation

The term "washing machine" is used metaphorically to suggest that corrupt politicians who join the BJP are absolved of their past misdeeds. This allegation is rooted in the observation that several politicians with corruption charges have been welcomed into the BJP and subsequently seen a reduction or cessation of legal scrutiny. This practice can be seen as a form of co-optation, where the ruling party integrates potentially oppositional elements to consolidate power. Marxist theory posits that the ruling class will absorb certain members of the lower or rival classes to maintain its dominance, thereby neutralizing potential threats to its hegemony.

### Misuse of State Machinery

The opposition's claim that the BJP misuses state institutions like the ED and CBI for political purposes is a classic example of how state apparatuses can be employed to maintain the ruling class's control. We view the state as an instrument of the ruling class, used to perpetuate its dominance and suppress dissent. When state agencies are weaponized against political rivals, it underscores the state's role in reinforcing existing power structures. This misuse of power to target opposition figures can be seen as an effort to dismantle political challenges and maintain the capitalist status quo, ensuring that the interests of the ruling elite are preserved.

### Electoral Bonds Controversy

The electoral bonds scheme, introduced by the Modi government, has been criticized for lacking transparency and enabling anonymous donations to political parties, which many argue disproportionately benefit the BJP. The Supreme Court of India's declaration of the scheme as unconstitutional adds a judicial dimension to this controversy. From Majdur Vimarsh's viewpoint, the electoral bonds scandal can be interpreted as a manifestation of how capitalist democracies facilitate the consolidation of power among the elite. This system allows wealthy capitalists to influence political outcomes through financial contributions, thereby ensuring that the ruling party remains indebted to corporate interests rather than the proletariat or general populace. 

 Conclusion

In essence, the allegations against the BJP—its role as a "washing machine" for corrupt politicians, the misuse of state machinery, and the electoral bonds scandal—highlight broader systemic issues within capitalist democracies. These practices reflect how the ruling class manipulates state structures to perpetuate its dominance. From a Marxist perspective, these dynamics are not anomalies but rather inherent features of a system designed to uphold the interests of the bourgeoisie. The opposition's critiques, therefore, underscore the need for a fundamental re-examination of the relationship between political power, state institutions, and capitalist interests in India.

Undermining Democracy and Social Justice

 

In the ongoing electoral battle, Rahul Gandhi of the Congress Party has leveled serious allegations against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), accusing it of undermining the core principles enshrined in the Indian Constitution and subverting the reservation system, which is integral to India's promise of social justice.

From a Marxist perspective, these accusations reveal a deeper struggle between the forces of reactionary bourgeois politics and the progressive agenda of empowering the oppressed classes. The BJP, representing the interests of the dominant capitalist class, is seen as systematically eroding the democratic institutions and policies designed to uplift the marginalized sections of society.

Gandhi's allegations assert that the BJP's actions threaten to dismantle the constitutional framework that safeguards the rights of the oppressed. The reservation system, a critical instrument for ensuring social and economic mobility for historically disadvantaged communities such as Dalits, Adivasis, and Other Backward Classes (OBCs), is being weakened. This attack on affirmative action policies is not just an administrative maneuver but a deliberate strategy to maintain the hegemony of the upper castes and the capitalist elite.

The Marxist analysis suggests that the BJP's ideological commitment to Hindutva and neoliberal economic policies is inherently antagonistic to the principles of equality and social justice. By undermining reservations, the BJP aims to preserve the existing social order, perpetuating economic exploitation and social hierarchies. The commodification of education and employment, combined with the rollback of affirmative action, exacerbates the conditions of the proletariat and other oppressed groups, ensuring their continued subjugation.

Moreover, Gandhi's critique highlights the BJP's broader assault on democratic institutions. The subversion of the judiciary, the erosion of parliamentary norms, and the suppression of dissent are indicative of an authoritarian drift, aligning with a capitalist agenda that seeks to eliminate any obstacles to market expansion and capital accumulation. The weakening of these institutions compromises the ability of the working class and marginalized communities to organize and resist exploitation.

In this context, Gandhi's allegations are not merely electoral rhetoric but a call to recognize the ongoing class struggle within India's polity. The resistance to the BJP's agenda must be understood as part of a larger movement to defend the democratic and egalitarian aspirations enshrined in the Constitution. The fight for reservations and constitutional integrity is, therefore, a fight against the capitalist exploitation and social oppression that the BJP's policies represent.

As the electoral battle intensifies, it is imperative for the working masses and progressive forces to unite against the BJP's reactionary agenda. The preservation of the Constitution and the reservation system is crucial for advancing the struggle for a just and equitable society. The need of the hour is to mobilize and build a robust counter-movement that can challenge the capitalist status quo and pave the way for a socialist transformation of Indian society.

In conclusion, Rahul Gandhi's allegations against the BJP underscore a fundamental conflict between two visions of India: one that upholds the ideals of social justice and democracy, and another that seeks to entrench the power of the capitalist elite. The outcome of this struggle will determine the future direction of the country and the fate of its most vulnerable citizens.

In the ongoing political tussle between the Congress Party and the BJP, the debate over reservation and the constitution underscores a classic clash that can be interpreted through a Marxist lens as a struggle between different class interests and ideological frameworks.

Rahul Gandhi's assurances to safeguard the constitution and the current reservation policies can be seen as an attempt to consolidate support from historically marginalized communities, such as Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC). From a Marxist perspective, these groups represent segments of the working class that have been systematically oppressed and exploited under the capitalist system, and affirmative action policies are viewed as mechanisms to ameliorate class disparities and promote social justice within the capitalist framework.

On the other hand, Narendra Modi's allegation that Congress will introduce religion-based reservations, specifically for Muslims, taps into a broader ideological struggle. Modi's position reflects a resistance to any policy that could be seen as altering the current socio-political order or threatening the dominant position of certain social groups. By emphasizing a guarantee against religion-based reservations, the BJP is appealing to its base among upper-caste Hindus and other groups who perceive affirmative action policies as a threat to their socio-economic privileges.

From a Marxist  standpoint, both parties are engaged in what can be viewed as a battle over the distribution of state resources, where the underlying motive is to secure political power by appealing to different segments of the electorate. The BJP's stance aligns with preserving the status quo and defending the interests of the ruling class and upper castes, while Congress's position, though framed in progressive rhetoric, can be seen as an attempt to mobilize the oppressed classes without fundamentally challenging the capitalist system.

This debate also exposes the limitations of reservation policies within a capitalist state. While reservations can provide some redress to marginalized groups, they do not address the root causes of inequality that stem from the capitalist mode of production. From a Marxist viewpoint, the ultimate solution lies not in redistributing quotas within the existing system but in a revolutionary transformation of the socio-economic order that eradicates the exploitation and oppression inherent in capitalism.

In conclusion, the ongoing political narrative between Congress and BJP over reservations and the constitution is not just a superficial policy debate but a reflection of deeper class struggles. Both parties, while differing in their approaches, operate within the constraints of a capitalist framework, aiming to secure their electoral base without challenging the fundamental inequalities perpetuated by the system.